COViSAL #240 – Un paso importante: El Tribunal ha reconocido nuestra voz / An Important Step: The Court Has Recognized Our Voice Fecha: 13 de junio de 2026 Estimada/o amiga/o, Español El 19 de mayo de 2026, el Secretario del Tribunal Federal del Distrito Norte de Texas registró formalmente mi carta del 6 de mayo de 2026, titulada: "Re: Submission of Petition, Signatures, Testimonies, and Documentation Regarding the Stanford Financial Receivership — Case No. 3:09-cv-00298-N", como Documento 3594 . Esto significa que mi escrito fue aceptado para su presentación y ahora forma parte del expediente judicial oficial. El US Receiver ha publicado mi escrito y su respuesta en el sitio web de la administración judicial: https://stanfordfinancialreceivership.com/#Escalona . Esta presentación provocó que tanto el US Receiver como el Examiner designado por el Tribunal presentaran respuestas formales. El Receiver presentó su respuesta el 1 de junio de 2026 (Documento 36...

  COViSAL     FO R    RESTITUTION ,    SINC E   200 9       http://www.covisal.org 20 de marzo de 2025 COViSAL #208 – Mensaje de Gilardi & Co. sobre cheques no cobrados o nulos Estimada/o amiga/o: Algunos de ustedes me han notificado haber recibido un correo electrónico de info@e.stanfordfinancialclaims.com con el asunto: "Request for Information re Uncashed & Void Stanford Receivership Distribution Check(s)" (Solicitud de información sobre cheques de distribución de la Administración Judicial de Stanford no cobrados y nulos). Este mensaje ha generado preocupación sobre la veracidad del remitente. Ante esta situación, contacté al Síndico Ralph Janvey y a sus abogados para aclarar el asunto. A continuación, comparto su respuesta traducida al español, junto con el mensaje que COViSAL envió al Síndico. Respuesta del abogado del Síndico, Ralph Janvey (19 de marzo de 2025): Asunto: Urgente – Correo electrón...

COViSAL  for Restitution, since 2009 November 6, 2024 To the Honorable Judge Esther Salas and all attorneys involved in Case No. 2:24-cr-00667-ES-1. United States v. TD Bank, N.A. We, victims of Allen Stanford's Ponzi scheme, represented by Jaime R. Escalona , ​​leader of the Stanford Victims Coalition Latin America (COViSAL), a coalition that has united thousands of families in Latin America, the United States, and worldwide since 2009; who lost our life savings, urge the Court to consider the following points before issuing its ruling: Irreparable damage: Stanford's victims have suffered devastating economic losses and many of them are in a precarious financial situation, unable to afford necessities such as medical treatment and sustenance. TD Bank's responsibility: TD Bank played a critical role in the Ponzi scheme by facilitating money laundering, directly contributing to the harm inflicted upon thousands of investors. An inexplicable and unacceptable Omission. T...

Time is of the Essence: Release Stanford Settlement Funds to Suffering Victims Now From: Jaime R. Escalona < jaenrodes@gmail.com > Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 12:10 AM To: Ralph Janvey < rjanvey@kjllp.com > Cc: Kevin.sadler@bakerbotts.com ; John Little < john@johnjlittlelaw.com >; Morgenstern, Peter < morgenstern@butzel.com >; Ed Snyder < esnyder@casnlaw.com > Subject : Time is of the Essence: Release Stanford Settlement Funds to Suffering Victims Now Dear Mr. Janvey, Thousands of families continue to grapple with financial and medical hardship due to Stanford's fraud. While the recent $100 million settlement from Trustmark offers a glimmer of hope, the proposed 25% attorney fee award leaves a mere $75 million for distribution. We urge you to prioritize victim relief by expediting the release of these funds without further delay . The mentioned distribution schedule, requiring court approval, presents a hurdle. We implore the Court to swiftly grant...

COViSAL Por Restitutio   Traducción al español de la versión original en inglés 20 de septiembre, 2017 Secretaría del Tribunal United States District Court Northern District of Texas 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75242 ATN: Cámara del Honorable David Godbey SEC Acción Civil: 3:09-CV-0298-N Honorable Juez: Le escribimos para expresar nuestra objeción y protesta sobre los acuerdos del Administrador Judicial, el Comité Oficial de Inversionistas de Stanford y otros, relacionados con el caso Stanford. Estos acuerdos generan millones de dólares en honorarios para los abogados y centavos para las familias afectadas. En esta instancia protestamos enfáticamente el acuerdo propuesto con Hunton y Williams LLP por $34 millones de dólares, de los cuales $8,5 millones son para honorarios de abogados. Durante los últimos 8 años los ahorristas de Stanford han recibido menos del uno por ciento de sus pérdidas de las distribuciones anunciadas y han tenid...

COViSAL For Restitution ___________________________ September 20, 2017 Clerk of the Court United States District Court Northern District of Texas 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75242 ATTN: Chambers of the Honorable David Godbey SEC Civil Action: 3:09-CV-0298-N Your Honor, We write to you in order to express our objection and protest the settlements by the U.S. Receiver, the Official Stanford Investors Committee, and others related to Stanford’s case. These settlements generate millions of dollars in fees for attorneys and only pennies for the families affected. In this instance we strongly protest the proposed settlement with Hunton & Williams LLP for $34 million, of which $8.5 million is for attorney’s fees. During the past 8 years Stanford’s depositors have received less than one percent of losses from announced distributions while being subject to a waiting period of almost a year per distribution.  At the same time, they have to ...

COViSAL For Justice & Restitution _______________________________________________________________ S eptember 23, 2016 Clerk of the Court United States District Court Northern District of Texas 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75242 ATTN: Chambers of the Honorable David Godbey Civil actions: 3:09-CV-0298-N/3:09-CV-01736-N/3:13-CV-2226-N/ 3:15-CV-1997-N/ 3:14-CV-3731-N We respectfully write to you in order to express our objection to the recent agreement reached by the U.S. Receiver and his attorneys, the Official Stanford Investors Committee, and the underwriters at Lloyd's of London. The continued delay in distribution from previous agreements has further frayed any trust the victims have in the Receiver and his attorneys. The saga drags on for thousands of families as they are forced to wait for money from the first agreements reached over six months ago. When Stanford Financial Group was seized by the U.S. authorities in 2009, the wo...