Skip to main content

EXAMINER'S COMMENT CONCERNING FROZEN STANFORD FUNDS


Last Update March 19, 2012

EXAMINER'S COMMENT CONCERNING FROZEN STANFORD FUNDS  

Since the conclusion of Allen Stanford’s criminal trial in Houston, Texas, the Examiner has received a large number of emails from Stanford Investors seeking the immediate release of the approximately $330 million that has been frozen in Canada, the United Kingdom and Switzerland at the request of the Department of Justice (DOJ). From those emails, it is apparent that there is considerable confusion among Stanford Investors concerning the status of those frozen funds.

At present, funds have been frozen in Canada, the United Kingdom and Switzerland at the request of the DOJ. The approximate amounts frozen in each jurisdiction are US $200 to $210 million in Switzerland, US $100 million in the United Kingdom, and US $20 million in Canada. At the conclusion of Allen Stanford’s criminal trial, the jury delivered a verdict concerning DOJ’s request to have these frozen funds forfeited to DOJ as the proceeds of criminal activity. The jury returned a verdict in favor of forfeiture. You may review the jury’s verdict HERE.

Unfortunately, the jury’s verdict does not make any of the frozen funds available for distribution to Stanford victims. Those funds are frozen in foreign jurisdictions (Canada, the United Kingdom and Switzerland) and are under the authority of courts or agencies located in those jurisdictions. With the jury’s forfeiture verdict, it is anticipated that DOJ will now focus its efforts upon seeking the release of those frozen funds so that they can be made available for distribution to Stanford’s victims.

There remain significant obstacles to be overcome by DOJ before any of the frozen funds can be made available for distribution. The primary obstacle is the opposition of Marcus Wide and Hugh Dickson, the Joint Liquidators of SIB appointed by the Antiguan Courts. The Joint Liquidators have asserted and continue to assert that all of the frozen funds should be released to them and not to DOJ. They have been engaged in litigation in Canada with both DOJ and the US Receiver seeking to block the conclusion of an agreement that would release a substantial portion of the funds frozen in Canada to DOJ. They have similarly been engaged in litigation in the United Kingdom and in Switzerland through which they oppose any release of the frozen funds to DOJ. Instead, they seek possession of the frozen funds.

The Joint Liquidators have also made it clear that they intend to apply a substantial portion of the frozen funds (should they obtain some or all of them) to the litigation and real estate development programs they hope to execute, and not to an immediate distribution to Stanford victims. Through their webinars and court filings, they have made it clear that they would likely retain as much as US $100 million to fund both lawsuits and the development of Antiguan real estate owned by various Stanford entities.

On November 18, 2011, the Official Stanford Investor Committee (“Committee”) sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice urging the Department to immediately begin to take steps to repatriate the Stanford funds currently frozen in Switzerland, the United Kingdom and Canada. The amount of such funds is in excess of $300 million. You may view a copy of the Committee’s letter HERE.

The Committee and the Examiner actively oppose the efforts of the Joint Liquidators to obtain control of the frozen funds as not being in the interests of any Stanford investor, regardless of nationality or domicile. The Committee and the Examiner have supported and will continue to support DOJ's efforts to obtain control of all the frozen funds and to distribute them to Stanford victims without delay.


Popular posts from this blog

FORMAL DEMAND: Immediate Interim Distribution of US$24.2M Unconditional Assets, Cessation of Estate Depletion, and Outstanding 22nd Report

June 20, 2026 Mark McDonald Joint Liquidator – Stanford International Bank Limited (in Liquidation) Grant Thornton New Zealand Limited Level 4, 152 Fanshawe Street PO Box 1961 Auckland 1010 New Zealand Kevin Hellard Joint Liquidator – Stanford International Bank Limited (in Liquidation) Grant Thornton UK LLP 30 Finsbury Square London EC2P 2YU United Kingdom Subject: FORMAL DEMAND: Immediate Interim Distribution of US$24.2M Unconditional Assets, Cessation of Estate Depletion, and Outstanding 22nd Report Dear Mr. McDonald and Mr. Hellard, I write on behalf of COViSAL and the Stanford International Bank (SIB) creditor body regarding your explicit written confirmation on May 7, 2026, establishing that the 22nd Report to Creditors would be issued on May 28, 2026—marking the standard six-month reporting cycle from your previous update. As of today, June 20, 2026, twenty-three days have elapse...

COViSAL #215 - 12ª Distribución Aprobada en EE.UU.; Incertidumbre en Antigua

  COViSAL -  For Restitution COViSAL.ORG View this email in your browser COViSAL    FOR  RESTITUTION,   SINCE  2009         http://www.covisal.org COViSAL #215 - 12ª Distribución Aprobada en EE.UU.; Incertidumbre en Antigua 29 de noviembre de 2025 Estimada(o) amiga(o): Te escribo para presentarte una actualización consolidada sobre el estado de la Administración Judicial en EE.UU. y la Liquidación del SIBL en Antigua, tras el reporte oficial de los Liquidadores Conjuntos del 28 de noviembre de 2025.  Administración Judicial en EE.UU.: 12ª Distribución en Marcha, Pendiente de Ejecución Orden Judicial Firme del 25 de Noviembre : El Juez Godbey aprobó la modificación del Plan Final de Distribución, autorizando: Pago retroactivo de  $36.15 millones  a las entidades Magness, Knudson y St. Anne's. Inclusión de estas reclamaciones en la distribución final. Un porcentaje de distribución del  7.10% ...

Stanford Receivership – Final Distribution Plan – Request for Clarification on Payment Methods (Check vs. Wire Transfer) and Unanswered Inquiry re: $8.1 Million Swiss Funds

  Stanford Receivership – Final Distribution Plan – Request for Clarification on Payment Methods (Check vs. Wire Transfer) and Unanswered Inquiry re: $8.1 Million Swiss Funds Jaime R. Escalona   < jaenrodes@gmail.com > 8:36 AM (4 minutes ago) to  Info-SFC ,  Ralph ,  Kevin ,  David ,  brendan.day ,  John ,  Ed ,  judith.blakeway April 7, 2026 VIA EMAIL To: Gilardi & Co. LLC Claims Agent for the Stanford Receivership info@stanfordfinancialclaims. com Ralph S. Janvey, Receiver Receiver's Attorneys: Kevin Sadler, David Arlington, Brendan Day c.c.  John Little, Examiner President of OSIC (Official Stanford Investors Committee): Ed Snyder, Judith Blakeway. Re: Stanford Receivership – Final Distribution Plan – Request for Clarification on Payment Methods (Check vs. Wire Transfer) and Unanswered Inquiry re: $8.1 Million Swiss Funds Dear Sirs, I write  on behalf of COViSAL and numerous other claimants  who are confused a...