Skip to main content

Analysis and Opinion - "Major Questions Doctrine Hands Power to Judges After Chevron"

OPINION - Analysis and Summary - "Major Questions Doctrine Hands Power to Judges After Chevron"

This article by Richard Pierce examines the Major Questions Doctrine (MQD) and its potential consequences for regulatory power.

Original source:

Here's a breakdown of the key points:

Shifting Landscape:

  • Chevron Deference Weakening: The legal principle giving deference to agencies' interpretations of statutes (Chevron deference) seems to be losing ground in the Supreme Court.

Rise of the Major Questions Doctrine (MQD):

  • This emerging doctrine empowers courts to reject agency interpretations on issues of significant national political or economic importance unless Congress explicitly authorizes such actions.
  • This potentially grants judges broad power to strike down agency regulations based on personal views, not necessarily clear legal grounds.

Impact on Agencies:

  • Alabama Association Case (2021): This landmark case established the MQD by invalidating the CDC's eviction moratorium during the pandemic.
  • The Supreme Court has since applied the MQD in other cases, impacting areas like environmental and health regulations.
  • Lower courts are increasingly using the MQD, potentially paralyzing agencies' ability to take significant regulatory actions.

Uncertain Application:

  • There's no clear definition of "major national significance" or how to measure economic or political significance.
  • This ambiguity leads to inconsistent application of the MQD across courts.

Political Concerns:

  • A study suggests judges might be using the MQD for politically motivated invalidation of agency actions, aligning with the appointing president's party.

Potential Consequences:

  • Widespread use of the MQD could significantly hinder agencies' ability to regulate effectively.

Author's Perspective:

  • Richard Pierce, an administrative law expert, expresses concern that the MQD grants judges excessive power and undermines effective regulation.

Overall, the article highlights a critical debate about the balance of power between courts and agencies in interpreting laws. The growing prominence of the MQD could have significant implications for the future of regulatory policy in the United States.


Jaime R. Escalona
On behalf of COViSAL for Restitution, since 2009.
https://www.covisal.org/       
Twitter: @COViSAL
jaenrodes@covisal.org
jaenrodes@gmail.com


Con DIOS, superaremos todos los obstáculos / With GOD, we'll overcome all obstacles


La labor de COViSAL, desde el 2009, es de índole investigativa, informativa y de difusión. NO debe interpretarse como asesoría legal. The nature of the work of COViSAL, since 2009, is research, information, and dissemination. It should NOT be interpreted as legal advice.

 

 

Popular posts from this blog

TD Bank Admite Culpabilidad, Víctimas Invisibilizadas de Stanford Exigen Justicia

     COViSAL    FOR RESTITUTION, SINCE 2009         https://www.covisal.org 18 de noviembre de 2024 El Honorable Merrick Garland Attorney General of the United States U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530   Asunto: El TD Bank se declara culpable y las víctimas invisibilizadas de Stanford claman justicia. Estimado Fiscal General Garland, Nosotros, víctimas del esquema Ponzi de Allen Stanford , representadas por Jaime R. Escalona , líder de la Stanford Victims Coalition Latin America ("COViSAL"), coalición que reune desde el 2009 a miles de familias de América Latina, Estados Unidos y del mundo entero; desesperadas reiteramos nuestra solicitud de justicia y reparación. La falta de acción del Departamento de Justicia (" DOJ ") contra las instituciones financieras que facilitaron el fraude, ha prolongado nuestro sufrimiento. En particular, deseamos llamar s...

COViSAL #190 - Summary of the Update to Creditors of SIB /Antigua. March 26, 2024.

COViSAL #190 - Summary of the Update to Creditors of SIB /Antigua. March 26, 2024. On March 26, 2024, Joint Liquidator Mark McDonald /Stanford International Bank Limited - in Liquidation ("SIB"), published the Latest Update to Creditors. See the report at the following links: Link to the original English document: https://www.sibliquidation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/JLs-Report-to-Creditors-March-2024-FINAL.pdf Link to original Spanish document: http://es.sibliquidation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/JLs-Report-to-Creditors-March-2024-SPANISH-TRANSLATION.pdf Link to the Spanish translation by COViSAL: https://www.covisal.org/2024/03/sib-actualizacion-acreedores-marzo-2024.html COViSAL Summary: Payments to Creditors: The SIB /Antigua Liquidation has made 3 payments totaling $133,180,958.00 equivalent to 2.6% of the amount admitted in each Claim.  $117,955,128.00 million was paid through checks and bank transfers. $15,225,830.00 million in unclaimed and accumulated funds to...

SIB - Actualización a Acreedores Marzo 2024 - Traducida al español por COViSAL

Traducción al español por COViSAL. Link al documento original en inglés: https://www.sibliquidation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/JLs-Report-to-Creditors-March-2024-FINAL.pdf Stanford Internationa l Bank Limited (En Liquidación) Actualización a Acreedores Marzo 2024   Tabla de Contenido Introducción ....................................................................................................... ...  3 Distribuciones .......................................................................................................   3 Actualizacion   sobre los   Esfuerzos   de   Recuperación . .......................................   4      Demanda contra Société General (SG)   (Switzerland)........................................ 4      Recuperación   de Activos   en Suiza.....................................................................   4 Recuperaciones ...