Skip to main content

Billionaire Stanford given 110-year jail term over $7bn fraud


A general view of Stanford International Bank on the Caribbean island of Antigua. The bank's founder Allen Stanford has been jailed for 110 years for perpetrating a $7 billion fraud.

Image: Gareth Copley/PA Archive

FORMER TEXAN BILLIONAIRE financier Allen Stanford has been sentenced to 110 years in jail after being convicted of perpetrating a Ponzi scheme worth some $7 billion (€5.5 billion).

A court in Texas was told the 62-year-old had siphoned off around $2 billion in funds deposited by clients, who had been told his investments were safer and more profitable than US government-insured accounts.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission claimed that his Stanford Financial Group had presented hypothetical projections as legitimate past records when trying to secure clients’ investments, misappropriating their funds and falsifying the group’s financial records to cover this up.
Investigators could not find 92 per cent of the $8 billion the bank claimed to command in assets and cash reserves.

“This is one of the most egregious frauds ever presented to a trial jury in federal court,” Judge David Hittner said in handing down the sentence.

Stanford had been convicted in March, and has spent the past three years in jail after being deemed a flight risk. He will likely never taste freedom again.

The sentence will bring some satisfaction – but likely little financial relief – to some 30,000 investors from more than 100 countries who were burned by bogus investments with Stanford’s group.
“This was not a bloodless financial crime carried out on paper,” Angie Shaw, director and founder of the Stanford Victims Coalition, said at the sentencing hearing. “It was and is an inconceivably heinous crime and it has taken a staggering toll on the victims.”

‘Scoundrel’

Jaime Escalona, who represents victims from Latin America, told Stanford he “took advantage of the trust that is placed in US companies and caused losses that prevented families from being able to pay for medical and basic living expenses.”

“You are a dirty, rotten scoundrel,” Escalona added.

In a tearful speech, Stanford showed no remorse and blamed the collapse of his empire on the “Gestapo tactics” of overzealous prosecutors and insisted that his investments would have eventually paid dividends, KHOU news reported.

“I’m not a thief,” Stanford, who did not testify at the trial, told the judge. “I am and will always be at peace with the way I conducted myself.”

A dual citizen of the United States and Antigua and Barbuda, Stanford was known for his largesse, especially on the two paradise islands.

He received a knighthood in 2006 from Antigua, where he was the largest employer, but that knighthood was revoked in 2010 after suspicions of his illicit dealings first came to light.

Stanford rose to global prominence by creating and funding the the Stanford 20/20 cricket tournament between West Indian nations, as well as a ‘Stanford Super Series’ with a total prize fund of $20 million, where the players on the winning team took person prizes of $1 million each.

Both competitions folded after 2008, however, when queries arose about how Stamford was funding the ventures.

Additional reporting by AFP.



Popular posts from this blog

Comentarios de abogados al mensaje de COViSAL "El Tiempo es de Vital Importancia"

Comentarios de abogados al mensaje de COViSAL "El Tiempo es de Vital Importancia..." A solicitud de numerosos miembros y seguidores de COViSAL, se presentan a continuación los comentarios de los abogados al correo electrónico titulado "Time is of the Essence...", enviado el 6 de febrero de 2024.   Primer comentario:   “Me parece que las primeras 6 de sus “preguntas” pueden responderse en gran medida revisando las numerosas actualizaciones en el sitio web de la Sindicatura. Las otras seis preguntas involucran tanto consideraciones estratégicas como incógnitas, tales como lo que un tribunal en particular va a decidir, esto hace que las preguntas sean incontestables de una manera significativa.   Esto también me parece un intento por parte de Escalona de mantenerse relevante.”   Segundo comentario:   "Estoy de acuerdo"   Tercer comentario:   "Sí. No creo que él ya tenga muchos seguidores. Quizás un pequeño grupo en Venezuela”

Exigencia de COViSAL a Grant Thornton para que después de catorce (14) años de ineficacia, presente un reporte claro con resultados y el plan de cierre de la Liquidación del SIBL.

28 de junio, 2023 Mark McDonald Liquidador Conjunto Stanford International Bank Limited - in Liquidation Asunto : Exigencia de COViSAL a Grant Thornton para que después de catorce (14) años de ineficacia, presente un reporte claro con resultados y el plan de cierre de la Liquidación del SIBL.    Estimado Sr. McDonald: Yo, Jaime R. Escalona , en mi carácter de fundador de COViSAL, coalición que agrupa más de 1500 sobrevivientes de la debacle del Stanford Financial Group; por medio de esta carta le transmito el disgusto de sus miembros por su siete (7) meses de silencio y la exigencia que me han hecho para que le solicite un informe detallado de los planes y estrategias en la conclusión de los litigios pendientes, cierre de la Liquidación del Stanford International Bank Limited ("SIBL") y distribución de los fondos restantes. Es obvio que recuperaciones adicionales por medio de litigios son inciertas. El litigio principal contra el Toronto Dominion Bank en Canadá por $4,50

Respuesta de COViSAL a los comentarios de Little, Sadler y Snyder al correo electrónico Time is of the Essence

Respuesta de COViSAL a los comentarios de Little, Sadler y Snyder al correo electrónico Time is of the Essence   Jaime R. Escalona <jaenrodes@gmail.com> 14:17 8 de febrero 2024 a Little, Sadler, Snyder   Estimados señores Little, Sadler y Snyder: Les escribo en respuesta a sus comentarios sobre mi carta, "El tiempo es esencial: libere ahora los fondos del acuerdo de Stanford para las víctimas que sufren". Si bien entiendo su perspectiva sobre algunos puntos, creo que un enfoque colaborativo centrado en la transparencia, la claridad y el bienestar de las víctimas es crucial. Abordar las preocupaciones sobre la transparencia: Mi carta planteó preocupaciones válidas sobre información clara y fácilmente disponible para las familias afectadas. Si bien el sitio web de la Sindicatura ofrece actualizaciones, la comunicación adicional que aborde preguntas específicas, como las planteadas en mi carta, puede aliviar significativamente la ansiedad y generar confi